Johns Hopkins added to lawsuit alleging price-fixing scheme amongst top-ranked universities


Dive Temporary: 

  • Johns Hopkins College has been added to a lawsuit that accuses greater than a dozen top-ranked establishments of attractive in a price-fixing scheme that favors rich candidates and drives up the cost of faculty. 
  • Federal regulation most effective permits faculties to paintings in combination on their monetary assist formulation in the event that they follow need-blind admissions, wherein they don’t believe candidates’ talent to pay tuition when making admission selections. The lawsuit, first filed ultimate month in a federal district court docket, says 17 universities coordinated on their monetary assist formulation even supposing they do not actually have the need-blind admissions insurance policies required to be eligible for the antitrust exemption. 
  • Prior to now, the criticism most effective accused 9 establishments of favoring well-heeled potential scholars as an alternative of adhering to need-blind insurance policies. It did not say whether or not the opposite seven had been actually need-blind, however it accused them of being ineligible for the antitrust exemption as effectively as a result of they allegedly conspired with the opposite establishments. However attorneys amended the criticism this week to allege that every one 17 defendants, together with the newly added Johns Hopkins, “systematically preferred rich candidates,” in step with a information free up. 

Dive Perception: 

The lawsuit is the newest blow towards the admissions techniques of top-ranked and selective universities. Many of those similar establishments can also be suffering from the end result of a prison problem to race-conscious admissions, which the U.S. Best Court docket agreed ultimate month to listen to.  

The next establishments have additionally been named within the price-fixing criticism: Brown College, the California Institute of Era, the College of Chicago, Columbia College, Cornell College, Dartmouth Faculty, Duke College, Emory College, Georgetown College, Massachusetts Institute of Era, Northwestern College, the College of Notre Dame, the College of Pennsylvania, Rice College, Vanderbilt College and Yale College.  

They’re all previous or present participants of the 568 Presidents Team, a collective of faculties shaped in 1998 to collaborate on a need-based monetary assist gadget. Johns Hopkins joined in 2021 and followed the gang’s monetary assist method for early resolution candidates within the fall, in step with the lawsuit. 

Johns Hopkins spokesperson Jill Rosen mentioned in an emailed observation that the college is reviewing the criticism. 

“We’re assured no longer most effective that we’ve got operated absolutely throughout the regulation however that our monetary assist and admissions practices have expanded get entry to to a Johns Hopkins training for the best reaching scholars from all socio-economic backgrounds,” Rosen mentioned. “We’re pleased with our dedication to need-blind admission and intend to vigorously shield this lawsuit.”

The fee-fixing criticism is full of public statements from admissions officials who’ve mentioned their establishments followed practices that gave a leg as much as rich candidates, particularly the ones placed on waitlists for admission. 

One former admissions professional for the College of Pennsylvania mentioned in an op-ed ultimate yr that wanting monetary assist may stay a pupil from being admitted during the waitlist. And a Vanderbilt College professional mentioned in a 2018 waitlist FAQ that the college reserves the correct to be need-aware when admitting scholars from the waitlist. 

The lawsuit additionally calls out insurance policies that choose scholars from households of previous or attainable long term donors. It issues to statements from former Duke College President Richard Brodhead, who mentioned in 2006 {that a} circle of relatives’s talent to make a donation to the college used to be a “plus issue” in admissions. 

In flip, the colleges have overcharged greater than 200,000 monetary assist recipients via “no less than loads of tens of millions of greenbacks,” the lawsuit alleges. It is looking for damages for college students who enrolled in undergraduate systems all through sure sessions beginning in 2003, won need-based assist from one of the most universities, however nonetheless paid tuition or room and board. Additionally it is asking the pass judgement on to dam the establishments from coordinating on pricing and fiscal assist.



Supply hyperlink

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.